Saturday, May 14, 2016

Spain v. bullfighting, Gareth Edwards: Martyr and athletes v. Russian Olympic doping


- The world’s athletes know that as the best of them gather in Brazil this summer, some among their number will be looking to pill, ‘roid or otherwise cheat their way to a gold medal. Most would like the Olympics to be clean, but the cheaters will always be one step ahead of those trying to stop them and so the would-be clean majority is left to rally behind the likes of Canadian cross-country skier and Olympic gold medalist Beckie Scott, who is a Winter Olympics athlete but nonetheless delivered a speech this week directed at the leaders of the World Anti-Doping Agency, who are the ones charged with keeping the Games clean. Scott, whose gold-medal celebration came years after the race because a doper beat her, addressed foundation board and told them that athletes want the agency to use its influence to ensure Russia won't compete at the upcoming Olympics if there's no guarantee they're clean. Scott and her fellow athletes say they want an expanded investigation into Russian sports, beyond track and field, and they want to know that when they line up in Brazil later this year, they'll be competing against clean athletes. “We put this call out in November, and were deeply disappointed with the lack of decisive action and follow-up,'' Scott said. She’s the chair of the WADA athletes committee and she pointed out that athletes are well aware of the “utter, complete implausibility of (Russia's doping system) being in place to just service track and field.'' Well-said, B. “That the doping was so widespread and nothing was done is almost incomprehensible to the athletes' community,'' she added. WADA has already promised to investigate allegations, delivered by whistleblowers Vitaly and Yulia Stepanov, that four gold medalists from the Sochi Olympics used steroids, but Russia continues to push back against the claims and this fight is only going to get nastier from here…….


- Unlike the bulls who step into the rings around Spain each year, the fight to protect these raging beasts may actually have a chance to succeed. España is gearing up for the annual sight of matadors facing half-ton bulls this month during Madrid's most important annual series of bullfights and the running of the bulls at the San Fermin festival in Pamplona next month, the drama is intensifying ‘twixt anti-bullfighting forces and the traditions' defenders, who have launched Spain's first pro-bullfight lobbying group. This group feels it’s needed because at least 17 Spanish cities and towns have slashed municipal funding for bullfights and bull runs or passed measures condemning or banning them in the year since the new leftist Podemos party won its first seats in local and regional elections. A third-place finish in an inconclusive December election was enough to splinter the country's traditional two-party system into four and is expected to happen again next month when Podemos could overtake the No. 2 center-left Socialists. In the midst of this chaos, bull spectacles are expected to be banned this summer on the Mediterranean island of Mallorca by the regional Balearic Islands parliament ruled by a coalition including Podemos. Six years ago, the Barcelona-anchored northeastern region of Catalonia prohibited bullfights but enshrined as cultural heritage bull runs and events featuring bulls running around with flaming balls of wax or fireworks affixed to their horns. The continued lament from animal rights kooks is that bull fights are among the planet's most blatant forms of animal cruelty because the bulls are intentionally wounded before fights and are then stabbed through the heart in combat. It’s this tradition that the new Fighting Bull Foundation of breeders, matadors, ring workers and aficionados are fighting for behind a prominent Madrid law firm. As always, it’s going to come down to who has the best money, best lawyers and most clout………


- Oh, the creative integrity of martyr/director Gareth Edwards. This self-sacrificer has stepped down from directing duties on the Godzilla sequel, “Godzilla 2,” and his reasoning for doing so is worthy of a sappy, dramatic montage of slow claps, orchestra music and a slow-motion walk off the set. Edwards directed the terrible 2014 revival of the sci-fi franchise, but has said he wants to concentrate on smaller projects after his stint directing the upcoming “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.” Yes, his creative integrity simply will not allow him to helm another massive movie with a nine-figure budget and more CGI effects than the human mind can comprehend. Production company Legendary Pictures recently gave “Godzilla 2” a March 2019 release date, delaying it nearly a year from its original June 2018, which makes a lot more sense now that we know the easily replaceable guy who was supposed to sit in the director’s chair was on his way out the door. Despite losing Edwards and delaying the movie, the studio reportedly remains committed to the franchise and is also committed to a monster vs. monster project in the form of “Godzilla vs. King Kong,” slated for release in 2020. Before then, “Godzilla 2” is set to feature the return of three classic movie monsters - Rodan, Mothra and Ghidorah. Against this effects-heavy, high pressure and big-dollar backdrop, the bold Edwards recently addressed film students at the Beijing Film Academy prior to the Chinese premiere of his take on “Godzilla.” He tried to paint himself as something of a sympathetic character who hadn't made millions of dollars directing bloated films with budgets larger than Third World nations. "If I was in the audience at film school, looking at me now, I would hate me. I never could have predicted it this way,” Edwards said during his speech. Here’s hoping that speech came with a movie soundtrack-quality string section in the corner, playing the most mournful violins possible to properly score this somber message………


- That’s certainly one way to break the resistance when union workers are striking outside your facility and trying to use their picket lines to disrupt your supply lines. The scene was Massachusetts and the setting was the picket line outside a Verizon facility where about 80 striking workers were walking the picket line early in the morning in their quest for all the things angry workers demand in a strike, i.e. better pay, better benefits and better working conditions. According to police, a liquored-up replacement worker accelerated and struck striking worker Joseph Rooney with his pickup truck, then continued driving with Rooney on his hood before stopping on an on-ramp to state Route 9 West, tossing the injured employee off the vehicle. After running Rooney down on the picket line around 8:20 a.m., when officers were assisting replacement workers in driving through the picket line of about 80 protesters, it wasn’t too difficult to identify or apprehend the suspect. Nor was it difficult to get justice, as no-longer-a-replacement-worker George Pulling pleaded not guilty in Westborough District Court to two counts of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, driving under the influence of alcohol and operating without a license. Clearly, standards for fill-ins at Verizon aren't too high and here’s hoping this doesn’t give companies any ideas when it comes to trying to bust strikes in the future. Stick to firing strikers, pelting them with rotten tomatoes and playing Black Eyed Peas music as a means of torturing them back onto the assembly line and leave vehicular assault as a last-resort, plan-B type of strategy for ending prolonged work stoppages………

No comments: