Saturday, January 02, 2016

The irony of Quentin Tarantino, volunteer to eat crappy MRE's for three weeks and UFC doping drama


- As always, hope that was worth it. Any time you engage in an activity that leaves at least one man dead and 380 others injured while causing a fire that gutted 1,000 shanties, there had best be a damn good reason. It’s doubtful that there is one in the Philippines, where fireworks kooks wreaked havoc and ended a life by setting off pyrotechnics to ring in the new year despite rain and a government warning campaign. The fatality came when - what else - a drunken dude lit a dynamite-like firecracker called "Goodbye Philippines" and embraced it in Manila as it exploded, ripping his jaw and killing him. The world is better off without this moron in the gene poon, but Health Secretary Janet Garin probably would have preferred to not be announcing a wholly unnecessary death to start a new year. Fire officials determined that a rocket lit by revelers set an abandoned hut ablaze and that’s why about 1,000 shanties in Manila's Tondo slum district are now nothing but piles of ash and rubble with several thousand families now homeless. So if fireworks are incredibly dangerous under the best of circumstances and the government went out of its way to warn people of their dangers, then why weren’t people more careful? Because many superstitious Filipinos usher in the new year with powerful firecrackers because they believe LOUD NOISES (somewhere, Brick Tamland is smiling) drive away bad luck and evil. What’s positive/still slightly disturbing is that Garin noted that this year’s injury tally was less than half of last year's toll because of rain late in the day and a government scare campaign starring graphic photos of past victims with their fingers ripped off by firecracker blasts. Thanks for proving that a new year doesn’t mean you’re any smarter than you were in the last one, Philippines………


- UFC middleweight contender Michael Bisping isn't waiting until next month to throw the first punch in his fight with former middleweight champion Anderson Silva. Bisping and confirmed performance-enhancing drug user Silva will square off at UFC Fight Night 83 on Feb. 27 in London and as one of the more vocal fighters on the topic of PED use in MMA, Bisping isn't a fan of Silva’s return after being suspended for testing positive for banned substances prior to and after his UFC 183 bout against Nick Diaz last January.  “I've lost a lot of respect for him for that,” Bisping said of Silva testing positive for PED usage. “I have never taken a performance-enhancing drug in my life, and anybody that does should be ashamed. We're all chasing a dream. All fighters have the dream of being the champion, and you've got to do it through hard work and determination. Anderson Silva tested positive to not one, not two, but three banned substances in your body.” The PED issue is obviously one near and dear to Bisping, who suffered a knockout loss to Vitor Belfort in 2013 while Belfort was undergoing the now-banned treatment of Testosterone Replace Therapy. In spite of his positive test, Silva is still regarded by many as the greater mixed martial artist ever, but being a confirmed steroid cheater will undoubtedly stick with him going forward and Bisping is among those who won't let him forget it. “To call yourself a martial artist and take performance-enhancing drugs, you're the biggest contradiction you could ever make, and you should be ashamed of yourself,” Bisping said. Ahead of their fight at the The O2 Arena in London in February, Bisping wants Silva to be tested multiple times to ensure a clean fight and at this point, it’s not easy to argue with him………


- Typically, soldiers in the U.S. Army eat subpar food while in the field and do so while being paid not nearly enough. Now, the Army is asking civilians to do the same, albeit for a short period of time and without the hazards of enemy combatants shooting at them or trying to blow them up. U.S. Army researchers have extended an invitation for folks to help improve the Army’s infamous Meals, Ready-to-Eat -- if those volunteers can eat nothing else for three straight weeks. The Army will pay volunteers $200 each if they can  eat and drink the provided rations for 21 days, then go back to a normal diet for 10 days The catch is that participants must eat MREs and only MREs for three weeks and can’t eat anything else. Anyone between the ages of 18 and 62 who "meets additional screening criteria” can take part in this effort that is designed to do more than simply make the food-like substances in MRE’s taste better. The researchers behind the study are also hoping to add other nutrients to the food and to look at its impact on bacteria inside the digestive system, potentially improving what they call "gut health." It’s good to have other goals because many have tried and failed to improve the MREs' notorious tastes and textures. Those in the study will receive a cookbook full of cleverly titled  dishes including "Bunker Hill Burritos" and "Fort Bliss-ful Pudding Cake.” The U.S. military has served up MREs since the 1970s and they often come in small individual packages designed to last for months or years on the battlefield. Maybe would-be volunteers for the study can cajole themselves into taking part by convincing themselves that they’re doing it to serve the men and women who sacrifice so much to serve their country……….


- Irony, thy name is Quentin Tarantino. The famed director, who notoriously threatened to scuttle his latest project, “The Hateful Eight,” because details from the script were leaked during production, has been sued by two scriptwriters who allege that his 2012 film “Django Unchained” infringes the copyright of their screenplay. Oscar Colvin, Jr. and his son Torrance J. Colvin have accused Tarantino of ripping off certain elements of their script, titled “Freedom.” In their lawsuit, the two men claim they submitted their screenplay to the William Morris Agency, which suggested Tarantino as a possible collaborator, and while that collaboration never happened their idea (allegedly) appeared on the silver screen without them involved. The suit states that the Colvins “provided the heart, bones and muscles to develop the unique idea that eventually would be transformed into Django Unchained … Tarantino took the plotlines and main story of Freedom and Tarantino-ised them.” Props for trying to create your own word because not enough people do that when filing a long-shot lawsuit, but “Tarantino-izing” a script might not hold up too well in court compared with, you know, actual physical proof. “Before Django Freeman, there was an escaped slave named Jackson Freeman who desired to purchase his family’s freedom from a malevolent plantation owner,” part of the suit says. “Before Dr. Schultz, there was Samson, another white man, who would assist Mr Freeman in his efforts to rescue his loved one(s) from slavery.” Tarantino said previously that his movie pays homage to Sergio Corbucci’s Django, but the plaintiffs argue that the project bears “far more similarities” to “Freedom.” Not surprisingly, the two men want hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation, although they did magnanimously stop short of demanding possession of all awards “Django” won………

No comments: