Friday, May 10, 2013

Greenland's glacier status, anti-Tebow momentum and David Bowie pisses people off


- Time to sober up, passengers on Delhi's subway. Subways tend to be the best transportation option for lushes who are too drunk to drive themselves home, but authorities for the subway system in India’s largest city are cracking down on drunks trying to stumble home after a night out on the town. Passengers will now face being breath-tested for alcohol consumption in an experiment aimed at preventing late-night brawls and other drunk-related incidents. As part of the experiment, a nyone who appears drunk will be tested and possibly refused entry to the metro system. This pilot program is the latest attempt to decrease the number of late-night fights on the city’s subway, which carries almost 2 million people a day. In a sense, it’s part of a larger debate over public concern about alcohol and lawlessness. The tipping point for the new approach was the December 16, 2012 gang rape on a New Delhi minibus – an incident in which a medical student died, prompting global outrage. All of the alleged perpetrators in the incident were drunk, according to prosecutors. There is no law against being drunk on a train in India, but the new standard under the pilot program will be refusing entry for anyone found to have more than 30mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood. "Drunkenness is an unnecessary nuisance to other passengers. It's uncomfortable if you have to share space with someone who is reeking of alcohol," Hemendra Singh, spokesman for the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), which is responsible for metro security. Way to be a total buzz kill, Hemendra. According to this bureaucratic wet blanket, officers will only breath-test people who shows signs of being under the influence of alcohol. To carry out the sobriety checks, the CISF has asked metro authorities for 130 hand-held breath-testing devices, similar to the ones used by traffic police. Sounds like the party’s over, Delhi drunks……


- David Bowie has two distinct talents in life: being a rock star and pissing people off. Fortunately for him, the two go well together and that is exemplified by his new music video for his latest single, “The Next Day.” It’s the title track off of his comeback album and the video is causing plenty of commotion because of its religious-centric content. The video stars Bowie as the Christ-like figure he has likely always imagined himself to be, with Gary Oldman as a priest and Marion Cotillard with blood gushing from her stigmata-studded hands. Those images captured the attention of a former Archbishop of Canterbury, who branded the video as “juvenile” and created enough of a stink that the video, which premiered Wednesday, was also briefly banned from YouTube on Wednesday before being reinstated later in the day. Former Archbishop of Cantebury Lord Carey is the one who blasted the video for being juvenile and criticized Bowie for “upsetting people.” “If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery perhaps Christians should not worry too much at such an exploitation of religious imagery," Carey wrote about the video. "I doubt that Bowie would have the courage to use Islamic imagery - I very much doubt it. Frankly, I don't get offended by such juvenilia - Christians should have the courage to rise above offensive language, although I hope Bowie will recognize that he may be upsetting some people.” Verrry subtle, Carey, very subtle. A little reverse psychology here, a challenge to Bowie’s toughness there and you have yourself a nice, snarky little statemnet. Other Catholic organizations also criticized the video, in which Bow’s Jesus-like character hangs out in a trashy nightclub frequented by priests, cardinals and half-naked women. Bowie and director Floria Sigismondi are likely reveling in the attention the video is receiving, knowing how many albums and digital singles it will help them sell………


- Groton is gridlocked in debate over a proposal to build a 10,000-square-foot Shri Shirdee Sai Baba Temple. Yes, a small city in Massachusetts is debating whether or not something called the Shri Shirdee Sai Baba Temple can be built, but a group led by Groton resident Barbara Dunn insists that its opposition to the project has nothing to do with religion. “I don’t care what their religion is, everyone is entitled to their own opinion,” Dunn said. “I thought about the size of it, the parking and the cars and the problems it’s going to create. There is already a problem on that road with traffic,” Dunn said of the temple scheduled to be built in the shadow of farm stands and wetlands. That farm and those wetlands happen to belong to Dunn, who claims she was fine with the Hindu worshipers bid to be her neighbor on the 28 acres of swampy woods along the Groton-Littleton line until she saw the rendering of the proposed temple. The design features an 800-foot domed tower, a prayer hall with a capacity of 400 people and 200 parking spaces. According to Dunn, the size and scale of the project is what threw her for a loop. “I was like ‘oh my God, I didn’t realize it was going to be that big,’” Dunn said. “It’s not about religion, it’s about the size.” Yes, size does matter….even when one is attempting to build a Hindu temple in rural Massachusetts. Church leaders want to build the bigger building because they say their group has outgrown the facility it currently rents in nearby Chelmsford. Their temple plan would cost $3 million, but only if they can get clearance for the project. Church officials have offered to sit down with concerned residents in the next few weeks and find a way to work out their differences so they and their worshippers can become a force for faith and tolerance in their new community. Maybe they can resolve the problems by using the tactics employed a few years back when a Mormon church was built just down Route 119 from Groton and many of the same aesthetic and traffic concerns were raised by concerned residents……..


- Say what you will about Tim Tebow, but no one in NFL history has ever inspired fans of a team that has nothing to do with him to create a website declaring their opposition to that team signing that person. Tebow, who was released last month by the New York Jets and cleared waivers without any interest from another team, is a Florida native and for a Jaguars team that cannot sell out home games, signing a hometown hero would seem logical….except new general manager David Caldwell has made it clear the team has zero interest in Tebow. However, Tebow supporters recently attempted to create a petition on the White House's website for the Jaguars to sign ttheir hero and an Orlando lawyer who took out an ad to the same effect and the anti-Tebow crowd seems to feel that its voice must be heard. Bold City Brigade, which bills itself as a new-age Jaguars booster club, has ponied up the necessary cash to acquire a domain name and build a website of its own, Evenifhesreleased.com. The name is drawn from he answer Caldwell gave at his introductory news conference when asked about the potential to pursue Tebow. "I can't imagine a scenario where he'd be a Jaguar, even if he's released," Caldwell said Jan. 10. Caldwell has not changed his stance since then and this week said the team wants “a fresh start.” The new anti-Tebow website has already generated more than 31,000 clicks and went live Wednesday morning in response to radio advertisements by Orlando attorney John Morgan urging owner Shad Khan to sign Tebow so the Jaguars can win "for the people.” "We are inspired to counter anything or anyone that chooses to attack or spread ignorance about our fan base," said John Caputo, president of Bold City Brigade. "We aim to do it in a tasteful and tactful manner, which represents our mission and members." Wrong answer, Johnny boy. Tasteful and tactful equals boring………


- Have you found yourself wondering lately how Greenland’s glaciers are doing? Glad you asked. For the past decade, ginormous icebergs have cracked off glaciers in Greenland and tumbled into the sea at an ever-increasing rate. Global warming has been blamed and enviro-lovers have fretted about runaway ice loss and rising seas. But wait…....there’s good news. A new study suggests that the rate of acceleration will slow due to the physics and geography that govern glacier movement. Although this sunny prognosis is not a suggestion that the rise in global temperatures will stop anytime soon, good news in relation to global warming is good news at this point. According to Faezeh Nick, a glaciologist at The University Center in Svalbard, Norway, the glacier melting will slow because the ice sheets will continue to melt and push up sea levels around the world at a lower rate than expected. Nick’s work contradicts previous studies that extrapolated the rate of acceleration seen since the late 1990s out to 2100 on the thesis that glaciers respond to warming in complex ways, especially those that end at the sea. These contact points, known as outlet glaciers, accelerate in bursts — dumping tons of ice into the ocean — before their pace slows. "It doesn't go lower than it was before, but it doesn't stay at the top rate,” Nick explained. Her results are based on individual models of the four largest outlet glaciers in Greenland and their individual response to atmospheric and ocean warming. Nick used these models to forecast future ice loss using two different scenarios of warming in the coming centuries and the four glaciers she studied account for 22 percent of Greenland's total contribution to sea level rise. If her findings are extrapolated to include iceberg production and surface melt from all of the island's glaciers, Greenland will contribute between 3-7 inches to sea level rise by 2100. At least that’s less than previously projected…….

No comments: