Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Beijing's lethal air strikes again, cats are killers and college athletes want TV money


- Maybe money really does ruin some of the better things in life. Back in the day, rap outfit G-Unit was young, hungry….and dirt poor. Today, its members have achieved varying degrees of success in the rap game, ranging from 50 Cent’s superstardom to his right-hand man Tony Yayo’s more modest success. Yayo believes that his life, along with those of 50 Cent, a.k.a. Curtis Jackson, and fellow G-Unit member Lloyd Banks, was better when the three of them weren’t rich and famous. "You know what's crazy? It's like when we didn't have any money, things were better," Yayo said. Together, the group made an impact on rap's underground mixtape scene in the early 2000s and at one point, the group expanded to five members with Young Buck and Game joining. However, along the way, Jackson’s fame eclipsed that of the group and by the time they released their sophomore album “T.O.S: Terminate on Sight” in 2008, Game at odds with the group and Buck was on his way out. Even in recent months, there still seems to be drama simmering between Jackson and Banks and Yayo believes money is at the heart of their troubles. "When everybody got money, it's like things just went downhill, so it's like, I dunno, egos," Yayo said. "I would love to see a G-Unit reunion. I would love to see me, Banks and 50 definitely onstage." Just don’t count on Game getting back with the original three members of the group, not if Yayo has anything to say about it. "My problem with [Game] is that once he got to the point where he wanted to be, when he sold 5 million records, it was G-Unot," he said. Some of Yayo’s discontent could stem from the fact that he has largely fizzled as a solo artist, releasing one album on a major label and a handful of mixtapes that have received a tepid response…….


- Breathing is still hazardous in Beijing, in case you were wondering. Passing the toxic crap the Chinese try to pass off as breathable air through one’s nostrils has long been hazardous to health, but Tuesday was an especially sh*tty day in the capital city as über-thick, off-the-scale smog shrouded eastern China for the second time in about two weeks. Airlines canceled dozens of flights because of poor visibility and Beijing temporarily shut factories and curtailed fleets of government cars. An omnipresent white haze cloaked the entire city and pedestrians donned face masks to guard against the caustic air. Canceling flights was an unwelcome development with this being the first week of the country's peak, six-week period for travel surrounding the Chinese New Year on Feb. 10, but you can't land in place you can't see. Reports on the ground showed an hourly peak level of PM2.5 — tiny particulate matter that can penetrate deep into the lungs — at 526 micrograms per cubic meter, or "beyond index," and more than 20 times higher than World Health Organization safety levels over a 24-hour period. Flights were canceled in Zhengzhou, Beijing, Qingdao and Jinan. Ripping air travel from the mix at a time of the year when China's transport system is consistently overwhelmed with those visiting for the Lunar New Year holiday is a sign of just how bad the air truly is. Because shutting a few factories is clearly going to fix the problem, Beijing's city government ordered 103 heavily polluting factories to suspend production and told government departments and state-owned enterprises to reduce their use of cars by a third. The government also advised residents to stay indoors as much as possible. A lack of wind meant the smog was unlikely to dissipate quickly. Maybe newly elected mayor Wang Anshun’s plan to remove 180,000 older vehicles from the city's roads and promote government cars and heating systems that use clean energy will be the answers Beijing seeks………


- It’s time for college athletes to start cashing in on a chunk of the money their universities and the hypocrites at the NCAA rake in every year based on their efforts. On Tuesday, a federal judge ruled against the NCAA's motion that players in an antitrust suit led by former UCLA star Ed O'Bannon should be precluded from advancing their lawsuit to pursue a cut of live broadcast revenues. Judge Claudia Wilken dismissed the motion, which would have prevented football and men's basketball players from pursuing that money, rejecting it on procedural grounds. The motion argued against players being able to amend their lawsuit last year to claim a share of all television game revenues, not just those from rebroadcasts. "Now the (NCAA and its co-defendants) are facing potential liability that's based on the billions of dollars in revenue instead of tens or hundreds of millions," said Michael Hausfeld, interim lead counsel for the plaintiffs. "It's a more accurate context for what the players deserve." The O’Bannon suits addresses the fact that college athletes do not have a union or similar body to negotiate a share of revenues from media and other licensing contracts and does so through class-action legal activity. Two legendary names in college basketball, Bill Russell and Oscar Robertson, have joined O'Bannon on behalf of all Division I players in football and men's basketball. The case is moving at a snail’s pace and Wilken on Tuesday set the hearing on that motion for June 20. At that time, the NCAA will be called upon to make its arguments against class certification on the merits rather than procedural objections such as the one she just rejected. "Although our motion to strike was denied, the judge has signaled skepticism on plaintiff's class-certification motion and recognized the plaintiffs' radical change in their theory of the case," NCAA general counsel Donald Remy said. Keep telling yourself positive things, Remy………


- Dammit world, how did so many of us miss the threat that was right before our eyes…..lurking in the corner, playing with a ball of yarn. Cats are ruthless killers and most of you had no idea. Maybe your eyes will be opened now that scientists from the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute and the Fish and Wildlife Service have dropped some knowledge on us all. These forward thinkers have discovered that domestic cats in the United States kill a median of 2.4 billion birds and 12.3 billion mammals a year. Sure, most of these deaths are from native mammals like shrews, chipmunks and voles, but these estimated kill rates are two to four times higher than mortality figures previously tossed around. To put the death total in perspective, more birds and mammals die at the mouths of cats, the report said, than from automobile strikes, pesticides and poisons, collisions with skyscrapers and windmills and other such causes. Simply put, the domestic cat is one of the single greatest human-linked threats to wildlife in the nation. “When we ran the model, we didn’t know what to expect,” said Dr. Peter Marra of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute and an author of the report. “We were absolutely stunned by the results.” Because this is the first serious estimate of just how much wildlife America’s vast population of free-roaming domestic cats manages to kills each year, the numbers should shock everyone who hears them. For their research, the scientists on Marra’s team sifted through the existing scientific literature on cat-wildlife interactions and standardized the findings from the 21 most rigorous studies. Anyone trying to argue that free-roaming cats, i.e. strays, are the real threats needs to know that this study showed that free-roaming pets account for only about 29 percent of the birds and 11 percent of the mammals killed by domestic cats each year. Looks like it’s time to clamp down on cats, y’all………..


- Quit complaining, Carlos Rivas. Why do people always complain when their bank gives them counterfeit $100 bills and leaves them wondering how they will be able to pay their bills or feed their family? Rivas is the latest example of this trend of entitlement after his Westborough, Mass. bank took his paycheck and in return, gave him 18 $100 bills, 14 of which just happened to be counterfeit. Sovereign Bank in Westborough gave Rivas $1,800 in cash and just because a mere $400 of that was legitimate legal tender is no reason to complain, but here Rivas is, complaining. His story is slightly twisted because he cashed the check at Sovereign Bank, but 45 minutes later he attempted to deposit the same money at Citizens Bank, where he has an account. He says that it’s the same routine he has carried out on a bi-weekly basis for more than a decade, but the routine was thrown off track Saturday when a teller at Citizens Bank informed him that 14 of the bills he attempted to deposit were bogus. A Citizens Bank spokeswoman spoke about the incident, saying, “We are required by law to confiscate and report to the United States Secret Service any suspected counterfeit notes that are presented to us. The Secret Service determines if the notes are counterfeit or if they are legitimate and can be returned.” Sovereign Bank promised to “begin an internal review immediately and assist authorities in their investigation.” Rivas remains in financial limbo while the ordeal is sorted out because his counterfeit money remains in the hands of law enforcement until the Secret Service figures out where the bad bills originated and how they arrives at the bank………

No comments: