Monday, August 06, 2012

Angry Minnesota otters, "Dumb and Dumber 2" lives and Occupy Frankurt fizzles

- Bear attacks are so last year in Minnesota, where the predator to fear at the moment is the mighty otter. Sometimes thought of as a furry, peaceful creature that pops up occasionally in a PBS nature special, the otter is on the attack in Minnesota. A second Minnesota swimmer has been attacked by an otter, just weeks after the first attack took place near Duluth. The second attack occurred near a cabin in McGregor, where a woman was swimming in a lake near the cabin her family owned when furry rage struck. Carol Schefers was enjoying what she thought would be a relaxing afternoon in the water when she suffered what she thought was a bite from a fish. “I thought it was muskies. I got bitten by muskies before,” she said. Instead, it was an otter that targeted her for a little “when animals attack” vengeance as she swam about 200 yards from where her husband Patrick and three children were also swimming. “I could see his little head circling around her,” Patrick Schefers said“And when it would go under the water, Carol would really go crazy, because that’s when it was biting her.” Like any good husband would, Patrick jumped into a boat and rushed to his wife’s rescue. By the time Patrick Schefers stopped the angry otter, his wife had suffered 18 bites, on her hand, foot, thigh, and the back of her knee. He took pictures of the bites, rushed his wife to the emergency room and called the Health Department for advice on otter bites. Carol Schefers was less fortunate than Anoka triathlete Leah Prudhomme, who was attacked last month near Duluth but didn’t suffer too much harm because her wetsuit kept the otter from inflicting too much damage. There has still been no concrete theory offered as to why Minnesota’s otters are so enraged…………


- So you’re saying there’s a chance. That famous line from slacker cult favorite comedy “Dumb and Dumber” could not fit any better with news that “Dumb and Dumber 2” will go ahead as planned and will likely start shooting early next year, according to star Jeff Daniels.
It was Daniels who revealed a few weeks ago that the project was in danger of cancellation after Jim Carey pulled out. Carey reportedly wanted out of the one role he seems perfectly suited for at this stage of his faltering career because he had grown "increasingly frustrated" about the "lack of enthusiasm" from film studios New Line and Warner Bros. Given a few weeks to reconsider his options, Carey has apparently re-thought the matter and along with Daniels, is currently waiting on the script to be finished by the film's creators, The Farrelly Brothers. "We almost were able to kinda get it done this year, but they're still working on the script. Jim wants to do it. I want to do it and The Farrellys want to do it. We're all hoping that'll come together early next year,” Daniels said. The original “Dumb and Dumber” was released in 1994 and starred Carrey and Jeff Daniels as dim-witted friends navigating mishaps and misadventures on a cross-country trip. An ill-conceived, ill-executed prequel titled “Dumb And Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd” dropped in 2003, but neither Daniels nor Carey was involved in the project. Then, fans of the franchise were thrown a bone earlier this year when Peter Farrelly, co-director of the original, revealed that he and brother Bob would direct "the first [true] sequel" to the original film. The events that followed have been a bumbling series of mishaps truly befitting the spirit of what “Dumb and Dumber” is all about………..


- Lying: Even if it helps you duck trouble and drama in the present, it may cost you down the road. A study conducted by psychologists from the University of Notre Dame in South Bend, Ind., found that liars may be unhealthier than their truthful peers. Researchers performed polygraph tests on 110 people over 10 weeks, with 66 percent of participants college students and the rest adults who lived near the university. Half of the subjects were instructed to stop telling major and minor lies for the 10-week study period, and other half served as controls and received no instructions. Both groups came to the lab once a week to complete questionnaires about their health and relationships take a polygraph test to determine how many large and small lies they told during the previous week. Over the course of the 10-week study, subjects in the group instructed not to lie reported better health and when members of the group told three fewer small lies than they did in previous weeks, they reported four fewer mental health complaints and about three fewer physical health complaints. The same pattern held true for large lies and additionally, participants in the no-lie group became more truthful over the 10-week study, the polygraphs revealed. By the midway point of the study, most of them saw themselves as "more honest" individuals. Throughout the study, participants who told fewer lies more likely to report improvements in personal relationships and better social interactions. Their relationship improvements significantly contributed to the overall health improvements, researchers found. "Recent evidence indicates that Americans average about 11 lies per week. We wanted to find out if living more honestly can actually cause better health," said study author Dr. Anita E. Kelly, professor of psychology at the University of Notre Dame. "We found that the participants could purposefully and dramatically reduce their everyday lies, and that in turn was associated with significantly improved health." Even participants in the no-lie group said they realized they could easily tell the truth about their daily accomplishments rather than exaggerate or stop making false excuses for not completing tasks. Kelly’s team presented their findings last week at the American Psychological Association's annual convention/nonstop kegger in Orlando and proved that while the truth can hurt, it can also improve health……….


- Floyd Mayweather Jr. may be out of prison after serving two months behind bars on domestic violence charges, but boxing fans shouldn’t expect the long-awaited fight between he and Manny Pacquiao to happen because Mayweather is a free man. Top Rank promoter Bob Arum, who represents Pacquiao, headed to the Philippines on Monday to sit down with his cash cow and discuss options for a planned Nov. 10 return to the ring. Arum plans to stay in Pacquiao's homeland for a week and said prior to departing that there are three candidates to face Pacquiao next -- and none of them is Mayweather. Ironically enough, Arum has long stood as a prime impediment to a Pacquiao-Mayweather fight, but he said that after the November fight: "I just hope we will be able to get the Mayweather fight done. I don't think we can do it in November with Mayweather just being released from jail and so forth. "I have had no signal from anybody on his side that he would be back so quick for a fight Nov. 10. I would think if we can make a deal it would be in the spring, in April, after March Madness.” Assuming fight fans don’t get a Pacquiao-Mayweather bout, they will likely be asked to throw away $50 on a pay-per-view event in which the headline bout will be Pacquiao against one of three challenges: welterweight titlist Timothy Bradley Jr. in a rematch of the tremendously controversial fight they had on June 9, junior welterweight titleholder Juan Manuel Marquez, who has already faced Pacquiao three times, or former three-division titlist Miguel Cotto, whom Pacquiao knocked out in the 12th round of an all-action welterweight title bout in November 2009. "I gotta tell Manny what I can afford for each fight and we need to talk about each fight, but he makes his own decision," Arum said. That decision will almost certainly disappoint anyone who still cares about boxing, although that number is alarmingly small by this point……..


- The Occupy movement is not having quite the impact in Germany that it has had in the United States. While the Occupiers haven't affected any real change in the U.S., they have managed to be at least an annoying and slightly disruptive force in the daily lives of residents of a few American cities for a prolonged period of time. That doesn’t appear likely to happen in Germany, not after German police began clearing anti-capitalist protesters from the Occupy Frankfurt camp next to the European Central Bank headquarters early Monday morning. Police calmly marched onto the scene, put up barricades around several dozen tents and asked people to leave voluntarily. A smattering of protesters banged drums or blew whistles and chanted "Occupy, Occupy," but there were no major clashes between protestors and The Man, no violent conflicts to be aired in a constant cycle on the nightly news. Instead, a small crane picked up heavy objects, such as old sofas, from the Frankfurt camp, and loaded them in the back of a truck for removal. Maybe Occupy Frankfurters saw the writing on the wall after a court ruling upholding city rules against camping on city-owned parkland, but that doesn’t excuse their weak decision to give up the fight and go along with what city official Joerg Bannach called the government’s attempt to clear the camp "as peacefully as possible." If the Occupy movement doesn’t mean enough to fight to keep it alive even if a bunch of judges in a courtroom say it has to end, then what was the purpose of initiating it in the first place………..

No comments: