- That’ll show ‘em what a legit, total badass you are, pint-sized female rapper Lady Sovereign. This chick’s rhymes and beats were already suspect and her hip-hop cred marginal at best, but spitting in the face of a doorman at a gay bar in Brisbane, Australia isn't exactly going to get her more respect. Yes, beefs with the law and arrests are general good for street cred, but getting liquored up and hocking a loogie in the face of a bouncer at a gay bar doesn’t exactly scream hardened gangsta. The alleged incident took place on first night of Lady Sovreign’s current Australian tour, just hours before she was scheduled to take he mic for her 4:40 p.m. slot on the opening date of the Parklife national festival tour. Sovereign, whose real name is Louise Amanda Harman, had been in Australia for a mere seven hours when she had one or five drinks too many, spit in the face of the doorman and found herself evicted from Beat, a popular gay nightclub in Brisbane's Fortitude Valley. The 5'1" Harman was reportedly hysterical as she was thrown out of the venue and spend the next few hours sitting in a cell at the local jail. She was released in time for her performance, but that didn’t lessen her ire toward The Man for trying to hold her down. "Brisbane police need to go catch some real criminals... what a waste," she Tweeted. "Spitting in someone's face is nasty, but how about a guy dressed up as a girl running at you in the toilets and punching you in the head?” Umm, OK? Not sure if you’re saying that happened to you or you just saw it happen, but my guess is that you were really, really drunk and the alleged punch to the head didn’t happen to anyone at all. Either way, Harman was charged with assault faced the Brisbane Magistrates Court on Saturday morning, where she pleaded guilty to assault and drunk and disorderly charges and was fined $345 and ordered to pay $172 in compensation to the bouncer. Way to ingratiate yourself to the country you’re visiting, L. Sovereign. Nothing like asking people to pay what I’m sure are bloated ticket prices to come see someone who is hammered out of her mind and spitting on the faces of the natives less than eight hours after landing in the country………….
- Normally, saying a college football program conducts its business like an NFL team would be a compliment and a testament to its professionalism, efficiency and high standards. When that comparison likens your program to the Oakland Raiders……well, let’s just say it’s less of a compliment and more of a scathing indictment. You may recall that last month, an Oakland Raiders assistant coach named Randy Hanson accused head coach Tom Cable of sucker punching him during a meeting, a claim Cable and the team later lied about and tried to cover up by saying that Cable merely flipped Hanson out of his chair, causing him to hit his head on a cabinet in the process. That case is still making its way through the legal process and Hanson is now pressing for assault charges, but suffice it to say that regardless of the outcome, University of New Mexico head coach Michael Locksley would do well not to emulate Cable’s example. Of course, someone should have told Locksley that before he (allegedly) punched wide receivers coach Jonathan "J.B." Gerald in the face after a "heated" coaches meeting around 7:15 p.m. on Sept. 20. Unlike Hanson, Gerald cooperated with the police and filed a report the day of the alleged incident. And unlike Cable, Locksley actually admitted his mistake, albeit in a prepared, cookie-cutter statement. "I apologized to Coach Gerald, the coaching staff and our team for my poor judgment," Locksley said. "I would also like to apologize to Lobo fans. Like I remind our players, when mistakes are made, you acknowledge them and deal with the consequences.” The way the fight went down, according to the police report, was that at one point in the meeting Locksley grabbed Gerald by the collar and later, things got heated again. Other coaches attempted to intervene, but Locksley slipped a nice jab in and hit Gerald square in the face, causing a small cut on the inside of his upper lip. An officer who responded to the scene of the incident also noted a scratch to Gerald's left forearm. This comes on the heels of a sexual harassment suit against Locksley by a former secretary in the football office, a suit that is reportedly on the verge of being resolved. Bottom line here: This guy is out of control, clearly has anger and self-control issues and based on his team’s winless on-field performance, Locksley should be looking for a new job by season’s end. Ironically, it was Gerald who has been on leave and missed Saturday's game against New Mexico State University for what the school termed personal issues. Just for the benefit of all involved, I’m going to go ahead and suggest that the entire New Mexico football program stop emulating the Raiders and start conducting themselves with some class and dignity…………..
- Days like today, I sincerely regret that my man Alberto Fujimori is no longer the acting president of Peru. Because while having your country’s former president plead guilty to charges of illegal wiretapping and embezzling government money to bribe politicians and journalists to support his 2000 re-election campaign is cool, having the guilty party as your current head of state is so much better. It’s also nice that a verdict was finally reached in this case, as this was the fourth criminal trial that Fujimori faced since being extradited to Peru from Chile in 2007. The guy had already been through three other trials for completely different offenses, so I’m sure he was tired of seeing the inside of courtrooms. Sentencing will take place tomorrow, but government prosecutor Jose Antonio Pelaez Bardales has asked the court for an eight-year prison sentence and a fine of $1.7 million to be paid to the state, and $1 million to go to victims of the wiretapping. The kicker is that Fujimori lost the election in question after serving as the country’s president from 1990 to 2000. The trial wasn’t much of a trial at all, as Fujimori admitted his guilt with a short "I agree" to the judges, avoiding the spectacle of the 60-plus witnesses the government planned to call to testify against him. The witnesses were set to include former congressmen, authors, journalists, former United Nations officials and presidential candidates, all of whom were to testify about the bribery and wiretaps. The shame in all of this is that Fujimori did a lot of good for Peru, leading the stabilization of the country’s economy and defeating the Shining Path gorrillas, who carried out terrorist attacks. However, dude also had issues with human rights abuses and corruption - namely that he liked to abuse people’s human rights and was notoriously corrupt. That corruption was on display from the time he took office as president in 1990 and allegedly used public funds to set up surveillance centers to intercept phone conversations of people deemed a threat to his rule. That tradition of corruption was something he carried through his entire term in office, bribing members of Peru's congress after the ruling party failed to gain a majority during midterm elections in 2000. That would have been bad enough, but my man Al Fujimori dipped into public funds for the bribe money. Regardless of the sentence that is handed down, he won’t be seeing freedom any time soon - as in the rest of his life. In his first criminal trial, Fujimori was sentenced to six years for breaking into the home of a political rival’s wife to confiscate incriminating videos and in April, he was sentenced to 25 years in prison after being convicted of authorizing the operation of a death squad responsible for killing civilians. The third installment of Fujimori on Trial came in July, when he was sentenced to 7½ years in prison for paying a $15 million bonus to an ally out of the government treasury. Stacked up against that impressive trio, a simple bribery case doesn’t seem nearly as bad………….
- All beware the Floor Mats of Death! If you are the owner of a late-model Toyota or Lexus, you are hereby advised that the floor mats in your whip could well kill you. Both car companies have advised drivers of 3.8 million of their cars to remove floor mats or risk a forced-down accelerator pedal that could lead to a fatal crash. Teaming up with Lexus and Toyota for this uplifting announcement was the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The trio released a statement Tuesday alerting drivers to the fact that the removable mats could interfere with the pedal and cause it to stick. "A stuck open accelerator pedal may result in very high vehicle speeds and make it difficult to stop the vehicle, which could cause a crash, serious injury or death," the statement declared. I’ve got two words for you on that one: Uh-oh! What’s disturbing is that Toyota recalled accessory all-weather floor mats in 2007 for similar problems, but the NHTSA observed that reports of vehicles accelerating rapidly even after the release of the pedal have continued. This warning applies to drivers of seven different makes of Toyota and Lexus vehicles. One story that helped trigger this warning is a fatal crash involving a family driving a 2009 ES350 loaned by a local Lexus dealer in San Diego, which the car maker admitted could have been caused by an all-weather floor mat interfering with the accelerated pedal because of a faulty mat installation. "There is an urgent matter," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood in the NHTSA statement. "For everyone's sake, we strongly urge owners of these vehicles to remove mats or other obstacles that could lead to unintended acceleration." Toyota plans a safety recall soon, but both NHTSA and the automaker warn Toyota and Lexus drivers of certain models to remove that floor mats sooner for safety. So what cars are affected? Here’s the list: the 2007-2010 Camry, 2005-2010 Avalon, 2004-2009 Prius, 2005-2010 Tacoma and 2007-2010 Tundra. The Lexus models are the 2007-2010 ES 350, and the 2006-2010 IS 250 and IS 350. As a quick aside, how nice is it that rich, spoiled people who drive a Lexus are now panicked because something could be very wrong with their cars? Now you know how the rest of us feel, Lexus owners. You’re just like the commoners, having parts of your car recalled and wondering if your ride is all that safe…………..
No comments:
Post a Comment