Sunday, June 09, 2013

Amazong rainforest floor fires, no bikinis at the Miss World pageant and Portland's naked bike ride


- One of the most common complaints about the new “The Lone Ranger” film is that it’s not true to the history of the franchise. Specifically, haters have lamented the fact that Johnny Depp’s Tonto character, long a sidekick to the Long Ranger, is the real star of the movie. Given that Depp is a much bigger name than the actor playing the Ranger – Armie Hammer – that dynamic was nothing if not predictable. According to Depp, Tonto’s sudden rise to prominence in the hero-sidekick relationship was not a coincidence. Depp said he strived to ensure his portrayal of Tonto in the made him seem like more than a sidekick. He also had the kahones to suggest that it was not to stroke his own ego, but rather to change the way Native Americans have been portrayed in movies. "Since cinema has been around, Native Americans have been treated very poorly by Hollywood,” Depp explained. “What I wanted to do was play Tonto not as a sidekick - like 'Go fetch a soda for me, boy!' - but as a warrior with integrity and dignity. It's my small sliver of a contribution to try to right the wrongs of the past.” Tonto does have his own fame separate from the Lone Ranger, having first appeared in a 1930s radio show and inspired his own novels, comic books and TV series. This movie is Depp's latest collaboration with Gore Verbinski, director of the first three “Pirates of The Caribbean” films, and Jerry Bruckheimer, producer of all four of the “Pirates” movies. Along with Depp, the cast of “The Lone Ranger” includes Helena Bonham Carter, Tom Wilkinson and former “24” cast member James Badge Dale. Jack White was to score the film and add some more star power to the project, but he backed out in December due to a scheduling conflict and was replaced by prominent composer Hans Zimmer. The movie debuts Fourth of July weekend and will undoubtedly rake in boatloads of money……


- If anyone visiting Portland, Ore. Saturday night had one too many Irish car bombs at the pub and stumbled out into the street just before midnight to what they thought was a bunch of naked people riding bikes around the city, they were not hallucinating. No, thousands of Portlanders really did go all naked cyclists Saturday night for the World Naked Bike Ride. The ride pulled out from the South Park Blocks at 10 p.m. and organizers kept details about the seven-mile route secret until the festivities officially got underway. The event has grown steadily over the years and in 2012, 4,200 naked bike riders took over city streets in southeast and southwest neighborhoods like Richmond, Sunnyside, Laurelhurst, Buckman and downtown. The best part of the ride – if there can be one when a whole lot of people who have no business ever being half- or fully naked in public take it all off anyhow – is that there is no need to register. Anyone can show up with their bike and without their clothes and head out for the ride. City officials know about the ride and with Portland’s liberal laws on public nudity, event organizers were able to secure a permit. Police merely asked riders to at least wear a helmet and shoes in order to avoid injuries and recommending the use of helmets. They did remind participants about the city code regarding indecent exposure, which states: “It is unlawful for any person to expose his or her genitalia while in a public place or place visible from a public place, if the public place is open or available to persons of the opposite sex.” In spite of that rule, officers elected to exercise  "tremendous discretion" as long as riders remained on the course………


- The JaMarcus Russell comeback train is picking up steam, but it hasn’t found a destination yet. The former Oakland Raiders No. 1 overall pick is working hard to get back to the NFL for the first time since he was released following the 209 season. After eating his way out of the league and hastening that departure by refusing to learn the playbook or visit the weight room, he has spent the past few months working out with former NFL quarterback Jeff Garcia at TEST Academy in San Diego. After beginning  his comeback at 315 pounds, Russell showed up for a tryout for the Chicago Bears on Friday at Halas Hall weighing a reported 265 pounds and displaying a "big arm" and "good, positive demeanor." Sources who saw the workout said Russell did struggle with the timing and accuracy of throws, which was to be expected for a guy who hasn’t played in a game in X years. The mere fact that his physical conditioning showed that he has worked diligently in recent months to get back to his playing weight of approximately 265 pounds is a positive sign, even though the Bears are unlikely to sign him. He was joined by two other quarterbacks, Jordan Palmer and Trent Edwards, during the workout and the Bears already have three quarterbacks on their roster. Initially, the Bears showed no interest in Russell and neither did any other team given his lineman-like weight when he first began working out. Losing 50 pounds seems to have changed that thinking and some of his erratic performance could be attributable to working with a group of receivers with whom he was unfamiliar at the workout. If he doesn’t sign with the Bears, Russell is believed to be interested in signing with a team on which he can learn under a veteran quarterback. Should he not sign with an NFL team within the next 30 to 45 days, he also would be open to signing with a CFL team. That’s a good sign because it indicates he’s humbled and willing to do whatever is necessary to prove he can still play. If and when he does get back on the field, he is still the guy who won just seven of 25 starts during his career at Oakland and was charged felony possession of a controlled substance, a drink containing codeine cough syrup, after officers raided his home in July 2010. He has some demons, but may finally be working past them……..


- All of the dudes who had been planning to buy a couple of kegs, fire up the grill and have a few of their bros over to watch this year’s Miss World pageant may want to skip the festivities. The best part of the competition – at least from a guy’s point of view – won't be quite as awesome this year. Contestants won't be strutting down the runway in high heels and bikinis in a time-honored tradition of objectification because the event will be held in the world's most populous Muslim country, Indonesia. Beauty queens will still vie for the pageant's crown in September, but they will do so in much more conservative beach attire. According to Miss World organizers, the 137 women in the competition will instead wear one-piece swimwear, some of which will also have sarongs over the top. They will do so to avoid causing offense in their host country and pageant officials are actually trying to convince everyone that it’s no big deal. "This is perfectly reasonable in a country that prefers one-piece swimwear," London-based Miss World Organization Chairwoman Julia Morley said. Clearly willing to slap on a fake smile and pretend everything is copasetic, Morley rebuffed suggestions the decision to ditch bikinis was made in response to local complaints about the contest. That contradicts local reports that a number of conservative groups had taken issue with the staging of the contest and specifically the presence of bikini-clad hotties. "Some people in Indonesia still consider it taboo for women to wear bikinis and outfits that expose body parts," said deputy tourism minister Sapta Nirwandar. Indonesia has a long history of clashing with musicians and others who show up for concerts or pageants and wear revealing attire, so ruining the Miss World pageant by forcing contestants to don 1950s-style swimsuits and journey back to the world of Archie Bunker and “Leave It to Beaver” should surprise no one……..


- So….what’s up with those previously unmapped wildfires in the Amazon rainforest? NASA believes it knows. Thanks to an innovative satellite technique, NASA scientists have determined a very specific type of blaze is responsible for destroying several times more forest than has been lost through deforestation in recent years. These fires below the forest treetops, or "understory fires," in the southern Amazon rainforest have been hidden from view from NASA satellites that detect actively burning fires. With a new method, NASA is now able to estimate of understory fire damages across the southern Amazon. 
"Amazon forests are quite vulnerable to fire, given the frequency of ignitions for deforestation and land management at the forest frontier, but we've never known the regional extent or frequency of these understory fires," said Doug Morton of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., and the study's lead author. In years with a higher number of fires, the area of forest affected by understory fires was several times greater than the area of deforestation for expansion of agriculture, according to Morton. He and his colleagues blame climate conditions as a more important factor in determining fire risk in the Amazon at a regional scale than deforestation. Understory fires on this particular frontier typically only reach a few feet high, but may burn for weeks at a time, spreading only a few feet per minute. Because Amazon trees are not adapted to fire, the damage can be extensive. The most damaging of the fires can kill anywhere from 10 to 50 percent of the burn area's trees. To better identify understory fires, Morton and colleagues used observations from early in the dry season, from June to August, collected by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, or MODIS, instrument on NASA's Terra satellite. By tracking the timing of fire damage and recovery, they were able to create a fingerprint of understory fire damages in Amazon forests. Between 1999 and 2010, understory forest fires burned more than 33,000 square miles, or 2.8 percent of the forest. There was no definitive link between understory fires and deforestation. The study’s findings could play an important role not only in combating fires in the rainforest, but also for estimates of carbon emissions from disturbed forests.
"We don't yet have a robust estimate of what the net carbon emissions are from understory fires, but widespread damages suggest that they are important source of emissions that we need to consider," Morton said. All of this because it’s not the roof that’s one fire, but the (forest) floor……..

No comments: