- It’s a simple question with a simple answer: Should you turn in someone you know who cheated on their taxes? No. The topic is coming up because it’s once again tax season and the country has just over a month remaining to mail (or electronically submit) their taxes to those ass clowns at the IRS. It’s a guarantee that more than a few people will cheat on their taxes because it happens every year. Skew a few numbers your way, omit some information and bam, a) your refund it bigger or b) the amount you owe is smaller. A recent poll from the IRS Oversight Board showed that 13 percent of those surveyed think this behavior is acceptable, up from 9 percent in 2008. Bearing that in mind, the IRS is upping the blood money, er, reward for turning in someone who cheats on their taxes. The IRS's informant program has been around for more than 140 years and rewards have never been higher. Should you choose to be a no-integrity rat and sell out your fellow citizens to The Man, you could receive up to 15 percent of the amount that has been underpaid, with a maximum award of $10 million. To sell your soul to The Man for a few bucks, you must fill out a claim form, which is available on the IRS Web site, and mail it to the agency or call the IRS tip line. What is particularly gutless about this approach is that although you must reveal your identity to the IRS, your name will not be made public. I say if you’re going to rat out someone for trying to stick it to The Man by cheating on their taxes, you need to be man enough to have your name made public. Of course, there is no minimum requirement for the amount in question, which could lead to a lot of people filing small claims against people they merely suspect of tax fraud in the hopes of scoring a few bucks or getting some payback for a past wrong. To combat this potential problem, IRS requires informants to provide personal information about the tax evader, including the person's social security number, address and date of birth. For big-time tax cheats, the IRS offers even more incentives to turn them in. Rats who sell out someone who cheats the IRS out of at least $2 million in taxes, penalties and interest will receive a minimum of 15 percent and a maximum of 30 percent of the amount owed. Additionally, if the suspected tax evader is an individual, his or her annual gross income must exceed $200,000. What I hate is that the IRS received tips from about 476 informants identifying 1,246 taxpayers in fiscal year 2008, the first full year the program was implemented. In other words, people are far too willing to sell one another out for cash. It’s one thing if you want to go down the street to your neighbor’s house and steal his TV because he’s cheating on his taxes. If you want to even the score that way, I don’t have a problem with it. Just don’t go selling that same neighbor out to The Man for some quick cash, that’s all I’m saying…………
- Why this next topic is even a topic at all, I’m not sure. But I suppose that there are just too many morons in the world for subjects like this to not be an issue, so onward we forge. Journey with me to Brooklyn, New York, where the current hot-button issue is none other that people bringing their infants and toddlers to bars. Sounds insane, no? It is insane, but in places like Park Slope and surrounding neighborhoods, parents just can't seem to shake the habit of bringing their little brats to the bar. Why they are unable to find a babysitter or find somewhere else, I don’t know. The issues are numerous relating to this trend, from bar patrons who don’t have kids feeling uncomfortable drinking, swearing and engaging in normal bar behavior in front of kids to those who worry what being around drinking, smoking, swearing people and bar fights will do to kids. I’m with those in the former category because they should not be asked to watch their language, to not smoke outdoors near strollers and to keep their drunk friends under control because some ass clown has brought their 4-year-old to the bar. Nor should you be asked to play peek-a-boo or talk baby talk to someone’s tot sitting in a baby carrier in the corner booth. The bar is where you go to unwind, to get your drink on and to enjoy some freedom and lack of constraints. Yes, I understand that in a place like New York, the cost of living is high and paying for a babysitter on a regular basis can be tough. But if you can't afford to pay a babysitter, then you don’t go to the bar. There are places you can bring your kids along if you absolutely have to, but the bar is not one of them. Recently, a user on the Brooklynian, a neighborhood blog, posted a question: "Which bars are child free?" The debate has been raging for two years, ever since the bar Union Hall, a popular New York gathering place, banned strollers from the premises. It was a brilliant decision and if I were looking for a bar to go to in New York, that decision would put Union Hall at the top of my list – or it would have if whiny, b*thcy parents who like toting their kids to bars hadn’t thrown a hissy fit and pressured Union Hall into doubling back and removing the rule. Even though the bar had a legitimate reason for banning strollers - it been issued tickets by the fire department at one point because strollers blocked exits – these tools who wanted to both get drunk and not have to pay for a babysitter for little Timmy didn’t want to hear it. Tough luck, knobs. You have kids, you forfeit certain parts of your life in order to raise those kids. Going to the bar a couple nights a week is one of those parts and you all just need to deal with it………….
- One of the thickest personnel files in the history of personnel files became public record recently and now the entire world knows exactly what sort of impact golfer John Daly has had on the PGA Tour for the 17-year span from 1991 through 2008. We all know the highlights: multiple divorces, numerous battles with alcohol, smoking and gambling, run-ins at Hooters and suspensions from the tour just to name a few. But the true depth of JD’s wandering ways is illustrated by the following nuggets of knowledge, which became public when the records were turned over as part of a court case. This 456-page behemoth reveals that the PGA Tour ordered Daly to undergo counseling or enter alcohol rehabilitation not one, not two, not even three, but seven freaking times. Seven stints in rehab is an impressive number, one that would make Amy Winehouse envious. Daly has also been placed on Tour probation six times, although the records don’t indicated if the probation was double super-secret in nature, and cited 11 times for "conduct unbecoming a professional." That doesn’t include the 21 times JD was cited "failure to give best efforts,” which seems like a very subjective evaluation and would also be tough to prove if a guy was playing drunk, which I have to assume happened once or 15 times. All told, these antics cost Daly some $100,000 in fines during the period covered in the file, which ends with the infamous Hooters incident in which he was found intoxicated outside a Hooters restaurant in North Carolina, ended up in the drunk tank and was suspended from the Tour for the six months of the 2009 season. Oh, and there was also the time JD almost drove his ride into an Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms agent after failing to stop at a security checkpoint at the 2005 U.S. Open in Pinehurst, N.C. He returned to the Tour midway through last season and was out playing this year at the start of the season, but remarked to a Golf Channel crew that he "was done" with the game following one particularly bad round. Of course, he was back on the course two weeks later at Pebble Beach, which surprised exactly no one. He’s also the subject of a new reality show on Golf Channel, which should be an interesting train wreck. I do have to wonder what the over/under on Hooters references in the file is, a number I would put somewhere about 471…………
- Russia’s focus isn’t only on its piss-poor Olympic performance and finding ways to get its athletics officials in front of the firing squad, er, fired as soon as possible. Make no mistake about it, they’re still pissed about winning a measly 15 medals and three golds at the Vancouver Games, but they can multitask. For instance, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov showed that he has far more optimism than the rest of the world when it comes to the growing international menace that is Iran. While the rest of the world has more or less resigned itself to the fact that dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Co. are a bunch of nuclear-happy freaks looking to create an arsenal of nuclear-powered weapons (i.e. bombs) and blow Israel (and perhaps others) right off the map, Lavrov seems to believe that there is still room for diplomacy rather than sanctions to resolve the dispute with Iran over its nuclear program. "We will concentrate all efforts on finding political and diplomatic solutions. These efforts have not yet been exhausted," Lavrov said Tuesday. Furthermore, Lavrov said his comments were in keeping with a statement by Russian President/Communist dictator Dmitry Medvedev, who on Monday said Russia would back new sanctions against Iran as long as they did not create a humanitarian crisis. For some odd reason, Russia seems intent on avoiding additional punitive measures despite the fact that Iran is openly boasting of its nuclear advances and marching blatantly and proudly toward creating a nuclear bomb. Unsurprisingly, both Russia and China have been reluctant to endorse any broader sanctions against Iran, probably because my mythical League of Fascist Dictators truly does exist and their leaders are all members of it. Either way, a fourth draft of a U.N. Security Council resolution regarding Iran is due in the next week or so and many diplomats believe it will contain a "symbolic" tightening of sanctions against Iranian government assets. Still, I am nothing if not a guy who loves optimism, so you keep those rose-colored glasses on, Russia…………
No comments:
Post a Comment