Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Belgian diamond heists, bionic eyes and "X Factor Karaoke" judging chaos


- Finally…..the bionic eye is a viable option for the sight-impaired in the United States. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has finally approved a bionic eye that won't restore sight to the blind, but will allow sight-impaired individuals to detect both light and dark. The FDA announced approval late last week for a device created by Second Sight Medical Products that can be used to treat the condition known as retinitis pigmentosa, a rare form of blindness. Retinitis pigmentosa is a genetic condition where the retina cells, which translate light rays into the images the brain sees, gradually deteriorate. Sufferers of the condition begin losing peripheral vision and their symptoms grow to the point where it is difficult to see things at night before they eventually lose their central vision. Studies place the number of people suffering from RP at one out of 4,000 people living in the U.S. To offer assistance for those afflicted with it, Second Sight Medical Products has created an artificial retina known as Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System. It is the first device that is implantable to treat RP and is now FDA-approved for patients  25 years of age or older who suffer from advanced RP, but can see some light. The complicated device consists of electrodes in a panel that are implanted surgically into the eye and glasses that have a camera attached. That camera sends images to the panel of electrodes, bypassing the retina and tapping directly into the eye’s optic nerve that signals the person’s brain to “see” the images. In approving the Argus II, the FDA said it may eventually approve it to treat additional conditions like macular degeneration, mostly affects the elderly and impacts the sight of more than 2 million Americans. Second Sight CEO Dr. Robert Greenberg said the company hopes to eventually be able to implant the panel of electrodes directly in the cortex of the brain to treat all forms of blindness…….


- Soccer’s biggest event is coming to Brazil next year and when it arrives, it will be packing a long-awaited addition to the sport that should avoid potential controversies on the pitch. FIFA, soccer’s governing body, committed Tuesday to using goal-line technology at the 2014 World Cup in Brazil and could have as many as four systems competing for selection. Anyone who has a reliable means for determining whether a ball crossed a goal line can now submit a tender for their system to be used at the Confederations Cup in June and next year's World Cup. "Interested GLT companies will be invited to join an inspection visit to the Confederations Cup venues, currently scheduled for mid-March, with a final decision due to be confirmed in early April," FIFA said in a statement. If previous FIFA bids for event hosting and other matters are any indication, a healthy envelope of large, unmarked bills should also accompany any bid. FIFA president Sepp Blatter zeroed in on the use of high-tech aids to help World Cup referees make goal-line decisions after seeing England midfielder Frank Lampard have a clear goal denied against Germany at the 2010 tournament in South Africa. FIFA's rule-making panel, known as IFAB, approved goal-line technology at competitive matches in July after two systems passed extensive tests. GoalRef, which uses magnetic sensors, and the camera-based Hawk-Eye system were used successfully at the Club World Cup in Japan in December and those systems will compete with two German systems that have completed tests and could soon be approved for use. The two approved system communicate information within one second to the referee's wristwatch and GoalRef uses magnetic sensors in the goalposts to track an "intelligent" ball, made by Danish company Select. Hawk-Eye is already used in cricket and tennis. If goals are determined accurately by technology, soccer fans will have to find another reason to riot………


- The people have spoken and their slurred, belligerent speech has been heard. Maker's Mark has heard the angry outcry of the drunken masses and backed down from plans to begin watering down its popular whiskey. The bourbon producer announced Sunday that it won't be diluting its product after saying last week it would have to cut the alcohol volume of its signature red wax-sealed whiskey to 42 percent from its customary 45 percent in order to meet rising global demand. After hearing one hammered person after another berate it for the change, Maker's Mark said it was reversing its decision and production resumed Monday with 45-percent alcohol content. "You spoke. We listened. And we're sincerely sorry we let you down," the company said in a statement. "While we thought we were doing what's right, this is your brand -- and you told us in large numbers to change our decision." The angry reaction across social networking sites was both impressive and alarming, as one has to wonder why people are so protective of the alcohol content in their whiskey and their resulting ability to get fall-down drunk as quickly as possible, but they can't be motivated to speak out and demand change on more important social issues. Rob Samuels, chief operating officer of Maker's Mark, cited thousands of phone calls, emails and social media interactions that made it  "very clear" that customers were less than pleased with that decision. However, the company still has to find a solution for the issue that caused it to water down the drink in the first place. More and more emerging liquor markets are popping up around the world and bourbon, with its sweeter taste, is appealing to consumers in countries such as India. Using less alcohol would allow Maker's Mark to stretch the supply. Bill Samuels Jr., the company's chairman emeritus, recalled  20 shortages in the 35 years he ran the company. Bourbon is a type of American whiskey that must be aged in new barrels and distilled at less than 160 proof and given the ultimatum handed down by consumers, it must also arrive on store shelves with 45 percent alcohol content……….
 

- When faced with a choice between making boring, overproduced, hacky mainstream pop music or being the credibility-less reality karaoke show judge, what’s a person to do? Demi Lovato may face that choice and it could tear her away from her role as a karaoke judge on “X Factor Karaoke.” Two of the show’s judges, L.A. Reid and Britney Spears, have already confirmed they will not be returning to the most prominent shameless attempt to rip off “American Karaoke” and Lovato sounds torn on whether she should return with two new partners in crime or walk away and pretend to be a real recording artist. "It's hard, 'cause at the end of the day, I'm a musician. So, I could take the opportunity to tour, and, you know, I have to be a business woman and I have to like balance it out on both aspects," Lovato explained. "But, at the same time I had some much fun. And I would love to go back. It's just a matter of making things work and, you never know, I may do both; I may just pick one or the other.” Oh no, the drama and the anxiety of waiting to see what a dime-a-dozen, totally replaceable and disposable pop hack will do with her career. Whatever she elects to do, Lovato needs to choose soon because the show is already auditioning prospective karaoke-ers for its third seasons. Should she return alongside show runner Simon Cowell, Lovato knows who should fill one of the vacant judging slots. "I would love to see Lady Gaga," Lovato said. "I don't know if that's possible or not." Lovato is actually in luck because Gaga just canceled a planned international tour because of a hip injury and there is no better job for an immobilized person with no musical credibility at all………


- The sleek, modern airport in Belgium’s capital scene became the scene of a major diamond heist Monday and the eight-figure crime has Brussels buzzing. Eight masked thieves stole $50 million in rough and polished diamonds in a blitzkrieg-quick heist at Brussels Airport, the Antwerp World Diamond Centre confirmed. According to police, the robbers used two vehicles to breach a security gate when the stones were already on an aircraft. Jan Van der Cruysse, a spokesman for Brussels Airport, said it took the thieves only three minutes to rob the cargo hold of the plane, which was bound for Zurich, Switzerland. Within minutes, the thieves fled through the same breach in the airport periphery they created when they entered. All eight were reportedly heavily armed but because they planned their operation well, they escaped with their targeted goods without firing a single shot. The flight the diamonds were to travel on was a regular passenger flight from Brussels to Zurich operated by Helvetic Airways on behalf of Swiss Air and there were about 20 passengers on board the aircraft at the time of the heist. "This was a very precise, almost military-organized and well-executed robbery," Van der Cruysse said. "We are an airport that is, as all international airports are, subject to very strict aviation security and safety regulations. It comes as a big surprise that something like this is possible. But of course, this is rather connected to banditism and organized crime rather than aviation security.” A spokesman for the Antwerp World Diamond Centre confirmed that the center is aware of reports that gold and platinum were stolen along with the diamonds. The stones began their day’s journey at the center, which has $200 million in stones coming in and out daily……..

No comments: