- What’s the price of having a year of your life wrongfully ripped from you by the legal system? For Ozem Goldwire of Brooklyn, that price is $340,000. That’s the amount the City of New York has agreed to pay Goldwire after he spent a year in jail for a crime he didn't commit. Goldwire, who is autistic, was sent to jail on charges that he murdered his sister in 2006. While no immediate explanation was given for how prosecutors ultimately decided Goldwire was innocent and that he should be released, it truly is secondary to having justice served. The judge presiding over the case described the circumstances as "the perfect storm for false confession," which I would have to concur with. Police had an easy mark: an autistic guy whom they could bully, intimidate and coerce. Goldwire’s attorneys argued that authorities pressured him into making a false confession after screaming, cursing and shoving him repeatedly. Additionally, he was accused of having sex with his sister. New York police detectives Nancy Malota, Christopher Scandole and Matthew Collin admit to no wrongdoing in the settlement, which is standard in these sorts of deals. No one, be it a civil case or criminal case, ever admits to having done anything wrong even as they are paying massive sums of money to settle the case. If you did nothing wrong, why are you paying so much as a dime? Attorney Gerald Allen - who filed suit against the city on behalf of Goldwire – called his client's imprisonment "a terrible, terrible injustice." What is certain is that Goldwire’s release does not come as a result of the real murderer (no, not the one O.J. Simpson is still looking for) being found. The murder of Goldwire’s sister remains unsolved. The lesson from this case is that as much as we would all like to believe that shady police work and interrogation techniques are no longer prevalent in the world, there are still detectives like Malota, Scandole and Collin, who will grill an autistic man for 21 hours in connection with the murder of his sister and tell him he won't be released until he confesses to the crime. Always good to have my faith in something – anything – reaffirmed in such an emphatic manner, detectives…………
- Riot Watch! Riot Watch! It has been far too long, Nicaragua, so I could not be happier to be back talking about angry social dissidents taking it to the streets in your capital of Managua. Seeing tens of thousands of people out in the streets of Managua making their voice heard was a freaking inspiration. "The only way for the government to change, as it has been shown in all these years, is for the people to go to the streets," said Dora Maria Tellez, a wise woman who was a main figure in President Daniel Ortega's government during the 1980s but who now leads an opposition party. "There is no other way," she said at the protests. The one downside of the protests is that they were mostly peaceful – that’s a disappointment. The majority of the protestors were expressing general outrage against their government, especially against Ortega's bid for re-election and the anniversary of last year's municipal elections, which the president's leftist Sandinista National Liberation Front party overwhelmingly won amid rampant allegations of fraud. The election saw the Sandinista party win mayoral races in 94 municipalities, but voting irregularities abounded even as the government refused to allow foreign and local monitors to do their jobs. The results were extremely delayed and there were major discrepancies between results certified by election officials and the tallies released on television. Additional fuel was added to the anti-government fire on October 19, when the country's supreme court lifted a constitutional ban on consecutive presidential terms, clearing the way for Ortega to run in 2011. The United States did its part to fan the flames last month when the State Department issued in a statement saying that it was concerned about the "manner in which the Constitutional Chamber of the Nicaraguan Supreme Court reached a decision on October 19 regarding re-election for Nicaraguan officials, including the President." Ortega’s supporters are attempting to argue that the government is acting on behalf of the people. That’s a nice sentiment, even if it is a total lie. Were it true, that would be sweet, but of course we all know that it’s 100 percent false. Because it’s clearly a lie, I am going to encourage the thousands of proud Nicaraguans who demonstrated on Saturday to continue taking it to the streets and next time out, let’s try to burn a few vehicles, overturn some police cars and do some substantial damaging of property………
- Happy Thanksgiving to Greg and Diane Horoski of East Patchogue, N.Y. The holiday is an especially meaningful one for the Horoski family after a Suffolk County judge wiped out the $525,000 that the Horoski’s supposedly owed OneWest Bank. Judge Jeffrey Spinner brought a decisive end to a mortgage battle in which the Horoski’s fell behind on their mortgage payments because of health problems and an interest rate change. They claimed in court that they tried repeatedly to restructure their loan, but that the bank would not cooperate. Instead, they received a foreclosure note from the bank. Not willing to lose their home without a fight, Greg and Diane Horoski went to court and found a sympathetic ear in Judge Spinner, who referred to the bank's actions as "harsh, repugnant, shocking and repulsive." He freed the Horoski's of $291,000 in principal and $235,000 in interest and penalties, but Spinner’s main focus appeared to be tearing the bank a new one for refusing to work with the couple in their attempts to refinance. In his ruling, the judge stated that said the bank "must be appropriately sanctioned so as to deter it from imposing further mortifying abuse." As you would expect, the bank issued a terse and pithy reply to the verdict, saying, "We respectfully disagree with the lower court's unprecedented ruling and we expect that it will be overturned on appeal." In other words, we’re still hopeful that we will have a chance to absolutely dick over this family and throw them out of their home, preferably the day before Christmas so as to inflict maximum pain, suffering and emotional distress. Of course, OneWest may have had a better chance to win the case had they not misled the judge about the dollar amounts at stake in the case, which Spinner claims they did. Lying to the judge is generally not a sound legal strategy, OneWest bank attorneys. I wish I could say better luck to you next time around, but I’m not in the habit of saying things I clearly don’t mean………
- For those of you who have been wondering why I never write about theater-related topics in this space (mostly because I have zero interest in it), here you go. If you have been wanting to see the popular play
No comments:
Post a Comment