Saturday, April 28, 2012

Riot Watch! Malaysia, sharks in peril and precocious MLB stars

- The future is now for the Washington Nationals. They enter the weekend 14-5, star pitcher Stephen Strasburg is back from Tommy John surgery and carving batters and now, precocious 19-year-old outfielder Bryce Harper is about to make his Major League Baseball debut. Harper, who was the No. 1 overall pick in the 2010 amateur draft, was recalled by the Nationals from Triple-A Syracuse. He joins the Nationals in Los Angeles for their series against the Dodgers and takes the roster spot of third baseman Ryan Zimmerman, who is going on the 15-day disabled list with inflammation in his right shoulder. Widely considered the top prospect in all of baseball and known for his bombastic, opponent-irritating ways, Harper isn't assured of a long run with the Nationals this time around. "Suffice it to say, this isn't the coming-out party for Bryce that we had in mind," Nationals general manager Mike Rizzo said Friday. "This isn't the optimal situation developmentally." Then again, Harper has done nearly everything ahead of schedule in his baseball career. He skipped his final year of high school, earned his GED and played one season of junior college baseball at the College of Southern Nevada before entering the draft to get a head-start on his professional career. He signed a five-year, $9.9 million contract in August 2010 and has been on the fast track to the majors ever since. Calling him up now wasn’t part of the plan, but a need is a need and right now, the Nats need Harper. “We had a need here for a left-handed bat. We're trying to get more of a left-handed presence in our lineup, and he is the guy who fit that role,” Nats manager Davey Johnson explained. Harper has toned down his act some as he has progressed, ditching the face paint he wore early in his career and stopping his bad habit of blowing kisses to opposing pitchers after homering off of them. He has also adjusted well after playing primarily catcher in college and being shifted to the outfield after being drafted. Rizzo has confidence he will continue to succeed even with his career trajectory altered. "This is a very confident person, and we expect him to do well in the major leagues," Rizzo said. "He's the type of guy who will handle anything that is thrown at him and will be the better for it." Should be interesting………..


- Life is hard for reef sharks. Doubt that fact? Then explain how and why as much as 90 percent of reef sharks have disappeared from reefs near populated islands, as discovered in a study led by Marc Nadon, a doctoral candidate at the University of Miami's Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science. Nadon and his team are the first to conduct a large-scale estimate of reef sharks in the Pacific, a group of species that includes the gray reef shark, the whitetip reef shark and the tawny nurse shark. Explaining why the numbers for these species are down isn't difficult, according to Nadon. "We estimate that reef shark numbers have dropped substantially around populated islands, generally by more than 90 percent compared to those at the most untouched reefs," he said. "In short, people and sharks don't mix." To prove that shocking claim, researchers collected shark-sighting data from more than 1,607 dives at 46 reefs in the central-western Pacific, which included reefs near the Hawaiian islands and American Samoa, along with remote reefs almost entirely devoid of human influence. To hone their study, they excluded sharks that aren't dependent on reefs. That left out three of the eight species they saw on their dives, including hammerheads. The remaining species to be counted were gray reef sharks, blacktip reef sharks, whitetip reef sharks, Galapagos sharks and tawny nurse sharks. Their numbers were small and humans, apparently we are the reason why………


- Nicki Minaj is all about the kids. Yes, a singer (note: Minaj is NOT a rapper, no matter how much she wants to think she is) who regularly works "p*ssy," "d*ck" and b*tch" in her lyrics is concerned about children mimicking her foul speech. She explained in a recent interview that she would be "very upset" if she heard children singing along to the "dirty" versions of songs like “Dirty Hoe.” And yes, there is apparently a “clean” verison of a song titled “Dirty Hoe.” Minaj laid out her point of view very logically and not at all hypocritically. "I don't want children cursing," she said. "I'm very strict on my nieces and my little brother. They have to listen to clean versions of music." In her flawed mind, there is a magical wall that can divide the music an artist releases into versions heard only by adults and versions suitable for everyone. "If you asked any adult, 'Would you like your children knowing every part of your life and speaking exactly the way you speak when you talk to adults?' they'd say no, so I'm a firm believer in children remaining children," Minaj said. Of course, she immediately contradicted herself by lashing out at those who suggest she should tone down her lyrics for her young audience on the grounds that their request is sexist. "Why do people ask me to lose swear words? Do people ask Eminem to lose swear words? Do they ask Lil Wayne to lose swear words? Nobody stops them and says 'Would you stop swearing... for the children, please?'" she lamented. Actually, N., Eminem has regularly gotten such criticism and the lyrics for his hit “The Real Slim Shady” specifically address the frequent criticisms he receives because, “Will Smith don't gotta cuss in his raps to sell his records; well I do, so f**k him and f**k you too!” But Minaj can’t be expected to have a clue what she’s talking about before she opens her mouth. Her remarks came while promoting her suck-tacular new album, “Roman Reloaded.” Oh, and the "explicit" version of the music video for the album’s lead single features her dancing in a pink bikini on a tropical beach. A clean version of the video hasn’t surfaced yet, for some odd reason……….


- A good name is half the battle for a new restaurant. Sure, a great location and tasty food also help, but a good name evokes certain connotations in the mind of potential customers and just might be enough to entice a would-be patron to dig for more information about a new eatery. For Paul Ardaji, owner of a new West Palm Beach (Fla.) restaurant called Fuku, the right name came during a trip to Memphis with his business partner. "We were walking down the street and I said fuku he looked at me strange but he got where I was going," said Ardaji. Fuku means good fortune, wealth and prosperity in Japanese and given the restaurant’s theme, it made perfect sense. Unfortunately for Ardaji, not every is able to rise above their inner 8-year-old and get past the sophomoric, juvenile pronunciation of the name that the moniker so easily lends itself to. And while no one can stop Ardaji from using the name, state officials can some him from trademarking it. When Ardaji sent a letter to the state to trademark the name, he was summarily turned down. "I believe they're culturally unaware of what the word means," his attorney, James D'Loughy said. "I think there is some puritanical viewpoint based on the letter we received." Uh-oh, not a puritanical blast. That means (legal) war. But D’Loughy isn't just reaching for the most controversial point to draw attention to the issue. In its explanation of the denial, the Florida Department of State Division of Corporations sounded extremely puritanical. "The mark consists of, compromises or includes immoral, deceptive or scandalous matter,” an official statement explained. Ardaji doesn’t believe the name fits any of those three descriptions and he worries that if the restaurant opens without the trademark, it's vulnerable to the name being used by other businesses. "The state looks at things from a very narrow scope. I think they'll realize it's not our intention to be scandalous or deceptive," he said. Sadly, Ardaji and his business partner may not have the resources to fight a drawn-out legal battle to obtain the trademark……….


- Riot Watch! Riot Watch! The Malaysian capital of Kuala Lumpur was the scene on Saturday as thousands of angry Malaysians calling for fair elections converged on the city center for a massive protest that powerfully challenged the government’s reformist credentials and could alter the timing of national polls. With an estimated 25,000-plus protestors on hand, the demonstration remained boringly peaceful at the outset, with demonstrators waving banners, chanting slogans and singing the national anthem. However, police did their part to escalate the situation by bringing in tear gas grenades and chemical-laced water to break up what they say was an unlawful assembly. Protesters dressed in yellow T-shirts had to know a violent end was ahead when they showed up at Merdeka Square and were met by riot police and barbed wire. They made repeated attempts to cross the square and were warned to disperse. The heavy police presence was there to enforce a court order that the protesters should not enter the symbolically important site. Thankfully, the Bersih (Clean) group responsible for the protest ignored the ban and made sure protestors marched as close as possible to the square. By marching toward the square, they all but ensured a repeat of violent clashes that marked Bersih’s last major protest in July 2011. The exact number of protestors wasn’t immediately know, but the number appeared to be less than the 100,000 organizers hoped to draw. Still, the message to the government of Prime Minister Najib Razak is clear: Fair elections or else, asshole. If obtaining those fair elections means ignoring a bogus rule that a historic square is reserved for military parades and national celebrations, so be it. In truth, the day may have ended without significant violence had one bold, inspirational group not made a sudden attempt to break through police ranks. Props to those maniacs, because they made a good protest a great one. Tear gas, water cannons and chemical water resulted and it was freaking on. Police and protestors battled for half an hour and baton-wielding cops chased demonstrators to neighboring streets. Still, only 20 protestors were detained. The government continues to insist that opposition groups’ demands are excessive, which is code for “might threaten our 55-year hold on power.” Sounds like more angry uprisings are needed…………

No comments: